Home » Mobile Internet » “4G” WiMAX vs. 3.75G HSPA+

“4G” WiMAX vs. 3.75G HSPA+

Prerequisites (June 2015⇒):

Welcome to technologies trend tracking for 2015⇒2019 !!! v0.7
5G: 2015⇒2019 5G Technologies for the New Era of Wireless Internet of the 2020’s and 2030’s
Networked Society—WTF ??? v0.5
Microsoft Cloud state-of-the-art v0.7
• Service/telco for Networked Society
• Cloud for Networked Society
• Chrome for Networked Society
• Windows for Networked Society

Opportunity for Microsoft and its Partners in FY17:

As progressed since FY15:

Or enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email:

Join 93 other followers

2010 – the 1st grand year of:

3.5G...3.9G level mobile Internet
• system-on-a-chip (SoC) and
reflective display technologies

Why viewed most (till Feb 1):

Marvell SoC leadership
Android 2.3 & 3.0
Hanvon's strategy
Welcome! or Home pages
Treesaver (LATELY #2!) and
IMT-Advanced (4G)
MORE ON THE STATISTICS PAGE

Core information:

See also: Mobile Internet (Aug’11) which is a total update on Aug 26, 2011 with a lot of additions to the original July 19, 2010 content on the following subjects:
– LTE and LTE Advanced — HSPA Evolved (parallel to LTE and LTE Advanced) — Heterogeneous networks or HetNets — Femtocells and Picocells — Qualcomm innovations in all that — Ericsson’s LTE Advanced demo — Current roadmaps on evolutions of current 3G+ broadband mobile networks

T-Mobile has just launched its 3.75G HSPA+ service in the US, which they wrongly call 4G (compare to the core information on Mobile Internet where standards are covered properly). See: T-Mobile USA: More HSPA+ [July 21]. Speedwise -however- they are on par or even better than the current “4G” service from Sprint.

PhoneScoop has published the results of their comprehensive testing 6 weeks ago. T-Mobile USA HSPA+ service has been found better on a download, upload and latency basis (especially on the last two).

… Sprint’s WiMAX network and T-Mobile’s HSPA+ network delivered roughly similar download speeds, just shy of 3 Mbps on average. These are real-world, average speeds, not ideal numbers skewed by a marketing department. 3 Mbps is easily twice as fast as your typical real-world speed with 3G, and faster even than many home DSL connections. …

See: 4G Networks Tested: WiMAX vs. HSPA+ [June 4]: IntroThe Numbers Equipment Summary

What was a quite interesting finding -however- that T-Mobile’s earlier HSPA 7.2 Mbps network service wasn’t much slower than HSPA+ or 21 Mbps.

One curious data point was comparing T-Mobile’s HSPA+ with their own HSPA 7.2 (slightly older 3G [correctly: 3.5G]) technology. If you just look at the theoretical peak numbers – 7.2 vs. 21 Mbps – you might think HSPA+ is almost three times faster than HSDPA 7.2. You’d be wrong. We compared them extensively, in all six locations. In our tests, the difference was small. At best, our webConnect Rocket USB stick with HSPA+ was only 15% faster than a standard webConnect USB stick with HSPA 7.2.

See also on my blog:

Advertisements

4 Comments

  1. […] also: Mobile Internet (core infomation), “4G” WiMAX vs. 3.75G HSPA+ [July […]

  2. […] Pingback: “4G” WiMAX vs. 3.75G HSPA+ | Experiencing the Cloud […]

  3. […] countries mentioned as beeing in the forefront of 3.75G (HSPA+) and 3.9G (LTE) implementation (see: “4G” WiMAX vs. 3.75G HSPA+ [July 24] and WiMAX/WiBro <=> TD-LTE and LTE in general [June 28]) had in Q1 much less than […]

  4. […] US situation has been described in my earlier post, “4G” WiMAX vs. 3.75G HSPA+ [July 24]. Please note that both the current major WiMAX provider, Sprint and the HSPA+ provider […]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: